References
1. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.
2. MA Foy, The Continuing Saga of Informed Consent (2018) 6(2) Journal of Trauma and Orthopaedics, at 54-57.
3. Roe v Minister of Health [1954] 2 QB 66; [1954] 2 All ER 131.
4. TL Beauchamp and JF Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics Oxford University Press 2009.
5. Bolam [1957] 1 WLR 582, at 589.
6. Canterbury v Spence (DC, 1972) 464 F 2d 772.
7. Sidaway [1985] AC 871, at 889.
8. Montgomery [2015] UKSC 11, at 87.
9. Rogers v Whitaker [1993] 4 Med LR 79; (1992) 175 CLR 479.
10. Wyatt v Curtis [2003] EWCA Civ 1779, at 16.
11. Chester [2004] UKHL 41, at 16.
12. General Medical Council, Good medical practice 2013 http://www.gmcuk.org/Good_medical_practice___English_1215.pdf_51527435.pdf accessed 4 December 2017.
13. Montgomery [2015] UKSC 11, at 87.
14. James Badenoch, A doctor's duty of disclosure and the decline of 'The Bolam Test': A dramatic change in the law on patient consent (2016) 84(1) Medico-Legal Journal 5-17, at 13.
15. S Seewoonarain, AA Johnson and M Barrett, Informed consent in orthopaedics: Do patients in the United Kingdom understand the written information we provide? (2018) 100-B (9) Bone and Joint Journal 1253-1259.
16. FM v Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 775 (QB).
17. RA Wheeler, Consent in surgery: Is there a Montgomery effect? (2016) 22(1-2) Clinical Risk 21-24, at 22.
18. Alex Matthews-King, NHS could be bankrupted by 'unsustainable' £65bn clinical negligence bill warn experts, Independent 2 February 2018 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/nhs-clinical-negligence-fine-bankrupt-crisisheathcare-experts-a8191241.html accessed 2 February 2018.